ARRON JACKSON READING CROWN COURT ACQUITTAL

ARRON JACKSON READING CROWN COURT ACQUITTALARRON JACKSON READING CROWN COURT ACQUITTAL

In 2024, the Offender Database recorded that then 30-year-old Arron Jackson—formerly of Weald Rise, Tilehurst, and Ox Drove, Burghclere—was acquitted of serious sexual offences following a trial at Reading Crown Court. The investigation established that Jackson had been accused of sexually assaulting and attempting to rape a woman while she was sleeping in July 2023. The prosecution reported that the complainant alleged Jackson had groped her and attempted sexual intercourse without consent on two consecutive nights while she was dozing.

The investigation established that the prosecution claimed Jackson had indecently assaulted the woman and tried to remove her clothing from behind. The court reported that the complainant described feeling Jackson’s erect penis before she pretended to wake up to stop the encounter. However, giving evidence from the witness box, Jackson denied that any sexual encounter had taken place at all, and his defence team emphasised the difficulty of proving a negative in such a “he-said, she-said” scenario.

JUDICIAL HISTORY AND ACQUITTAL

The court reported that Jackson had a complex judicial history involving similar allegations. The investigation established that in 2021, Jackson was originally convicted of raping a different sleeping woman in an incident dating back to 2010. He was sentenced to over six years in prison and placed on the Sex Offenders Register for life. However, that conviction was subsequently overturned at a retrial, and he was acquitted of those charges before facing this most recent trial.

Judge-led proceedings at Reading Crown Court concluded in 2024. For the allegations stemming from the incidents in Tilehurst, the jury found Arron Jackson not guilty of all charges. The investigation established that the defence argued the prosecution had failed to meet the burden of proof, noting that Jackson did not have to prove the allegations were false. As a result of the unanimous not guilty verdicts, Jackson was cleared of the 2023 allegations and maintains no active convictions for sexual offences.


STATUS AND STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

Based on the judicial outcomes as of 2024:

  • Legal Status: ACQUITTED (Not Guilty of attempted rape and sexual assault).
  • Previous History: Conviction for a 2010 rape was OVERTURNED at retrial.
  • Custodial Status: RELEASED (Cleared of all pending sexual offence charges).
  • Sex Offenders Register: REMOVED (Following the acquittal and the previous conviction being overturned).
  • Judicial Oversight: Proceedings concluded at Reading Crown Court; investigated by Thames Valley Police.
  • Defence Case: Asserted that no sexual encounter occurred; highlighted the burden of proof remains on the prosecution.
  • Origin: Tilehurst, Berkshire (Address also given as Burghclere, Hampshire).

MONITORING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION

Following the 2024 acquittal, Jackson is no longer subject to the statutory requirements of the Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) or the notification requirements of the Sex Offenders Register. Authorities reported that since his previous conviction was overturned and he was found not guilty at this latest trial, he does not carry a criminal record for sexual violence. The investigation established that the jury’s decision indicates the prosecution did not provide sufficient evidence to convince them of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The conclusion of the 2024 trial ensures that Jackson’s legal standing is that of a person with no active convictions for the reported predatory strikes. While the allegations involved serious claims of violating the safety and human rights of a sleeping woman, the judicial process in Reading determined that the evidence did not support a conviction. As a result, there are currently no court-mandated restrictions on his movement, residency, or employment in Newbury, Tilehurst, or elsewhere.


QUESTION – Given that the defendant had a “Previous Conviction Overturned” and was then acquitted of a “Second Similar Offence,” do you believe the law should legally mandate that juries are informed of a defendant’s previous (overturned) convictions if the allegations follow an identical pattern of behaviour?


If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.