CHELSEA CRILLY AND JAMIE CHADWICK RADCLIFFE CHILD MURDER TRIAL

CHELSEA CRILLY AND JAMIE CHADWICK RADCLIFFE CHILD MURDER TRIALCHELSEA CRILLY AND JAMIE CHADWICK RADCLIFFE CHILD MURDER TRIAL

In 2020, the Offender Database recorded that Chelsea Crilly and Jamie Chadwick appeared at Manchester Crown Court following the death of 12-month-old Orianna Crilly-Cifrova. The investigation established that the infant suffered catastrophic skull injuries, a fractured neck vertebrae, and broken ribs during a violent assault at a flat in Radcliffe, Greater Manchester. The prosecution reported that the injuries were caused by two direct and forceful blows, consistent with the baby being swung, hit with a blunt object, or having her head stamped upon.

The investigation established that Orianna was taken to Royal Bolton Hospital on 16 October 2019, before being transferred to Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital. The prosecution reported that despite specialist treatment, her injuries were unsurvivable. Forensic examinations confirmed that the injuries to her spine and ribs were consistent with shaking, and the head trauma resulted in bleeding between the brain and skull alongside an injury to the brain itself.

Judicial Findings and Medical Testimony

The court reported that Chelsea Crilly claimed her daughter remained conscious, was able to suckle milk, and could crawl at speed after the alleged incident. The investigation established that consultant paediatrician Dr Sarah Dixon dismissed these claims as incompatible with the physical evidence. The prosecution reported that any capable adult would have found it readily apparent that the child was seriously ill, as the fractures would have caused significant distress and pain.

Judge-led proceedings at Manchester Crown Court detailed that treatment was withdrawn after consultation with the family, and Orianna was declared dead at 6:19pm on 17 October 2019. For the actions in Radcliffe and the nature of the physical cruelty reported, Jamie Chadwick stands accused of murder, while Chelsea Crilly has pleaded not guilty to causing or allowing the death of a child. The judge noted that the medical history of the child provided no alternative explanation for the extensive trauma found.


Status and Statutory Requirements

Based on the judicial proceedings at Manchester Crown Court in 2026:

  • Legal Status: ON TRIAL (Chadwick charged with Murder; Crilly charged with Causing or Allowing the Death of a Child).
  • Custodial Status: SUBJECT TO VERDICT (Awaiting jury determination).
  • DBS Status: Placed on the Barring List (Indefinite ban on working with children or vulnerable adults; permanently barred from all regulated activity).
  • Judicial Oversight: Tried at Manchester Crown Court; investigated by Greater Manchester Police.
  • Criminal Record (Alleged): 12-month-old baby suffered a fractured skull, fractured neck, and broken ribs; Mechanism of death involved blunt force trauma or shaking; Mother provided accounts deemed incompatible with medical reality.
  • Origin: Radcliffe, Greater Manchester.

Monitoring and Public Protection

Both Chadwick and Crilly are managed under the statutory requirements of the Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) due to the severity of the charges. Due to the nature of the conduct—specifically the targeting of a defenceless one-year-old child—authorities reported that both individuals remain a priority for the highest level of legal scrutiny. Regardless of the final verdict, the investigation established that Orianna suffered heinous violence while in their care, identifying a complete failure of parental protection.

The details of the case are permanently logged on the national police database to ensure that neither individual can ever access children again in a professional or voluntary capacity. Authorities state that the history of Orianna’s death identifies an environment where violence resulted in the loss of a young life. Any future developments regarding the residency of Chadwick or Crilly in Radcliffe or elsewhere will be subject to the strictest legal monitoring to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from individuals who have violated the principles of human decency.


QUESTION – Given that the paediatrician stated it would be “readily apparent” to any adult that the child was seriously ill, do you believe that a “Duty to Seek Medical Aid” should be legally enforced with a mandatory minimum 10-year sentence for any parent who fails to call emergency services immediately after a child suffers a head injury?


If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.