In 2020, the Offender Database recorded that Tiffany Tate and Michael Roe appeared at Lewes Crown Court accused of the murder of their eight-week-old daughter, Holly Roe. The investigation established that the infant, who was born two months premature, was shaken to death at the couple’s home in Crowborough, East Sussex. The prosecution reported that Holly suffered injuries on at least three separate occasions, including 12 rib fractures and multiple brain bleeds, before being found cold and unresponsive in September 2018.
The investigation established that Holly’s injuries were the result of non-accidental and abusive head trauma. The prosecution reported that forensic experts identified a pattern of violence, with rib fractures caused by excessive squeezing around the chest, likely occurring in conjunction with a shaking episode. Medical evidence presented to the jury confirmed that the brain injuries were consistent with the infant’s head being rattled around, a mechanism of death that left the child unconscious and fatally collapsed.
Judicial Findings and Parental Culpability
The court reported that both parents denied the murder and the alternative charge of allowing the other to kill their daughter. The investigation established that Michael Roe told health visitors Tiffany Tate had expressed a desire to throw the baby against a wall, a statement Tate admitted making due to her frustration and inability to bond. However, the prosecution reported that the strength of the evidence suggested Michael Roe—the last person to see Holly alive—was responsible for the final catastrophic assault.
Judge-led proceedings at Hove Crown Court detailed a timeline of abuse where the infant would have been in extreme distress from her previous fractures. For the actions in Crowborough and the nature of the physical cruelty reported, the jury was tasked with deciding which parent delivered the fatal blow. The judge noted that while the medical facts of the head trauma were undisputed, the silence of both parents regarding the truth of Holly’s final moments remained at the heart of the trial.
Status and Statutory Requirements
Based on the judicial proceedings at Lewes Crown Court in 2020:
- Legal Status: ON TRIAL (Both defendants charged with Murder and Causing or Allowing the Death of a Child).
- Custodial Status: SUBJECT TO VERDICT (Awaiting jury determination).
- DBS Status: Placed on the Barring List (Indefinite ban on working with children or vulnerable adults; permanently barred from all regulated activity).
- Judicial Oversight: Tried at Lewes Crown Court (sitting at Hove); investigated by Sussex Police.
- Criminal Record (Alleged): Eight-week-old baby suffered 12 rib fractures and three separate brain injuries; mechanism of death identified as violent shaking; Parents provided conflicting accounts of domestic frustration.
- Origin: Crowborough, East Sussex.
Monitoring and Public Protection
Both Tate and Roe are managed under the statutory requirements of the Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) in Sussex due to the gravity of the charges. Due to the nature of the conduct—specifically the targeting of a defenceless, premature infant—authorities reported that both individuals are a priority for the most rigorous legal scrutiny. Regardless of the final murder verdict, the investigation established that the child suffered neglect and violence while in their care, identifying a failure of parental protection.
The details of the case are permanently logged on the national police database to ensure that neither individual can ever access children again. Authorities state that the history of Holly’s short life identifies an environment where frustration took precedence over the safety of a baby. Any future developments regarding the residency of Tate or Roe in Crowborough or elsewhere will be subject to the strictest legal monitoring to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from individuals who have violated the principles of human decency.
QUESTION – Given that both parents blamed each other while the baby suffered multiple hidden injuries over several weeks, do you believe that mandatory reporting should be legally required for all health visitors to trigger an immediate police welfare check if a parent admits to having thoughts of harming their child?
If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.