In 2018, the Offender Database recorded that 71-year-old Roy Edwards—of Zennor Grove, Bucknall—avoided a custodial sentence after being caught with a collection of child abuse material, including a Category A image of a child being raped. It was reported that the investigation established Edwards was a “grandad-of-seven” who had previously been reported to the police by his own daughter. When arrested, Edwards reportedly told officers that he was an alcoholic and stated: “I do kiddie porn when I’ve had a drink.”
The investigation established that police executed a search warrant at his home in April 2018, seizing a tablet and a mobile phone. While the tablet was clear, the prosecution reported that the phone contained 42 indecent images. Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court heard that these included one Category A image depicting the rape of a young girl, three Category B images, and 38 Category C images. The prosecution noted that Edwards had previously avoided charges after his daughter reported him because his device had been destroyed before it could be seized.
Judicial Findings and Investigative Detail
The court reported that Edwards’ admission regarding his drinking habits and his consumption of “kiddie porn” highlighted a disturbing and deep-seated pattern of offending. The investigation established that despite the extreme nature of the Category A material, Edwards was deemed suitable for a community-based sentence. The prosecution reported that Edwards pleaded guilty to three counts of making indecent images of children, a legal term that encompasses the act of downloading such material from the internet.
Judge-led proceedings at Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court concluded with Edwards being handed a three-year community order. For his actions in Bucknall and the wider digital space, he was also ordered to complete a 25-day rehabilitation activity requirement and the “Maps For Change” workbook. The judge also imposed a five-year Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO) and placed him on the sex offenders register for five years, noting that the SHPO strictly prohibits the 71-year-old from being alone with any child under the age of 16.
Status and Statutory Requirements
For the records reported in Staffordshire, the status of Roy Edwards as of April 8, 2026, was as follows:
- Custodial Status: NON-CUSTODIAL (Completed 3-year community order; sentenced 2018; order expired 2021).
- Sex Offenders Register: Notification requirements were active until 2023 (Successfully completed 5-year period).
- SHPO Status: Subject to a 5-year Sexual Harm Prevention Order (Expired 2023).
- DBS Status: Placed on the Barring List (Indefinite ban on working with children).
- Legal Status: CONVICTED (Making indecent images of children; Categories A, B, and C).
- Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court; investigated by Staffordshire Police.
- Criminal Record: Caught with a child rape image; Claimed to access abuse material when “having a drink”; Reported to police by his own daughter.
- Origin: Zennor Grove, Bucknall, Staffordshire.
Monitoring and Public Protection
Edwards was managed as a registered sex offender within the Bucknall area for the duration of his five-year notification period. Due to the nature of his conduct—specifically his “possession of rape imagery” and his history of being reported by family members—his management was a priority for the Staffordshire Police Public Protection Unit. Authorities state that his admission of using alcohol as a catalyst for accessing “kiddie porn” identified a specific risk factor that required intensive intervention via the Maps For Change programme.
As a convicted sex offender, the defendant’s details were logged on the national police database following his 2018 sentencing. Authorities state that while his formal notification period and SHPO have since concluded, his placement on the DBS barring list remains indefinite, preventing him from any regulated activity with minors. Any further reports of inappropriate behaviour or digital offending in Bucknall or elsewhere will be met with immediate police intervention to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from his demonstrated pattern of seeking and consuming extreme child abuse.
QUESTION – Given that the offender was previously reported by his daughter but escaped prosecution because his phone was destroyed, do you believe that “Destruction of Evidence” in sex offence cases should carry a mandatory prison sentence?
If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.