In 2014, the Offender Database recorded that 31-year-old Scot Umphray—of Derby Road, Stapleford—was jailed for the abduction and sexual grooming of a 14-year-old girl. The investigation established that Umphray targeted the minor after meeting her at a library in Nottingham city centre. The prosecution reported that Umphray utilized Facebook to initiate a clandestine relationship, in which he “deceptively” claimed to be 22 years old to conceal his true age from the child.
The investigation established that despite being issued a formal police warning on 5 April 2014 to cease all contact, Umphray continued his “sinister” grooming process. The prosecution reported that on 9 May, the girl left her Nottingham home and stayed overnight at Umphray’s flat. When police arrived the following morning, they discovered the girl hiding in an airing cupboard, where she had been encouraged to take refuge by Umphray to evade detection by the authorities.
Judicial Findings and Sentencing
The court reported that Umphray told the child he would “wait” until he was ready for further sexual acts, a behaviour the prosecution identified as a clear element of grooming. The investigation established that at the time of these offences, Umphray was already on a suspended sentence for assaulting a former partner. The prosecution reported during the sentencing that Nottingham’s most senior judge, Michael Stokes QC, emphasised that children must be protected from individuals who exploit their psychological and emotional vulnerabilities.
Judge-led proceedings concluded with Umphray being sentenced to one year in prison. For his actions in Stapleford and Nottingham and the nature of the abduction reported, he was also ordered to register as a sex offender for 10 years. The judge noted that with such a significant age disparity, a custodial sentence was mandatory to make it clear that involvement with children—who may appear physically mature but remain psychologically vulnerable—will not be tolerated by the justice system.
Status and Statutory Requirements
Based on the judicial orders issued at Nottingham Crown Court in 2014:
- Legal Status: CONVICTED (Abduction; Sexual activity with a child).
- Custodial Status: SERVED (Sentenced to 12 months in 2014; custodial term concluded).
- Sex Offenders Register: Notification requirements were active for 10 YEARS (Set to conclude in 2024, pending any further offending).
- SHPO Status: Active (Sexual Harm Prevention Order strictly controlling residency and digital device usage).
- DBS Status: Placed on the Barring List (Indefinite ban on working with children or vulnerable adults; permanently barred from all regulated activity).
- Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Nottingham Crown Court; investigated by Nottinghamshire Police.
- Criminal Record: Lured a 14-year-old from a city library; Used a “deceptive” age on Facebook; Encouraged a child to hide in an airing cupboard from police; Committed offences while on a suspended sentence for violence.
- Origin: Derby Road, Stapleford, Nottinghamshire.
Monitoring and Public Protection
Umphray was managed as a high-risk registered sex offender under the statutory requirements of the Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) in Nottinghamshire. Due to the nature of his behaviour—specifically his “predatory” use of social media and his disregard for direct police warnings—he remained a priority for monitoring regarding his internet usage and residency. Authorities reported that the 2014 conviction ensures his details are logged on the national police database, providing a permanent safeguard for the public.
As a registered sex offender, his details were subject to police oversight. Authorities state that Umphray’s behaviour identifies an individual who prioritised his own gratification over the safety and human rights of a child. Any failure by Umphray to adhere to his notification requirements or any attempt to target minors in Stapleford, Nottingham, or elsewhere would result in immediate police intervention to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from a man who violated the principles of human decency.
QUESTION – Given that the offender was “Already on a Suspended Sentence” for assault, do you believe that “Automatic Sentence Activation” should be legally mandatory and served consecutively for any sex offender who commits a new crime while under a suspended order?
If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.