In 2020, the Offender Database recorded that 32-year-old Liam Rothery—of Ceda Park, Whitehaven—was sentenced after a desperate attempt to destroy digital evidence. The investigation established that when police arrived at his home at 7:10 am on 7 November, Rothery failed to answer the door for 50 minutes. During this time, he performed a factory reset on an iPad and dunked a Samsung tablet into a dish of water to prevent officers from accessing his “vile” collection of imagery.
The investigation established that despite the water damage, specialist digital forensic software successfully recovered the data. The prosecution reported that on the Samsung tablet alone, Rothery had amassed 10,000 Category C images and seven Category B images of girls as young as six. His internet search history confirmed a “sinister” and “prolific” interest in young girls, with the massive volume of 10,000 images being downloaded in a period of just 16 days.
Judicial Findings and Perverting Justice
The court reported that Rothery made full admissions during his police interview, including a charge of perverting the course of justice for his attempt to destroy the tablets. The investigation established that while his efforts to wipe the iPad were partly successful, the recovered evidence was sufficient to prove his “wicked” digital conduct. The prosecution reported that during the hearing at Carlisle Crown Court on 9 August 2020, Recorder Ciaran Rankin noted the deliberate and calculated nature of Rothery’s attempts to evade detection.
Judge-led proceedings concluded with Rothery being handed a 36-month community order. For his actions in Whitehaven and the nature of the indecent images reported, he was ordered to complete 150 hours of unpaid work and an accredited sex offenders’ programme. The judge noted that Rothery must also sign the sex offenders’ register for five years and adhere to the strict terms of a Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO) to ensure he is permanently monitored.
Status and Statutory Requirements
Based on the judicial orders issued at Carlisle Crown Court in 2020:
- Legal Status: CONVICTED (Making indecent images of children; Perverting the course of justice).
- Custodial Status: NON-CUSTODIAL (36-month community order).
- Sex Offenders Register: Notification requirements were active for 5 YEARS (Set to conclude in 2025, pending any further offending).
- Community Service: 150 hours of unpaid work.
- SHPO Status: Active (Sexual Harm Prevention Order strictly controlling digital device usage).
- DBS Status: Placed on the Barring List (Indefinite ban on working with children or vulnerable adults; permanently barred from all regulated activity).
- Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Carlisle Crown Court; investigated by Cumbria Constabulary.
- Criminal Record: Attempted to destroy a Samsung tablet in water to hide evidence; Downloaded 10,000 images in just 16 days; Targeted girls aged between six and eight; Admitted to perverting the course of justice.
- Origin: Ceda Park, Whitehaven, Cumbria.
Monitoring and Public Protection
Rothery was managed under the statutory requirements of the Cumbria Probation Service during the completion of his community order. Due to the nature of his behaviour—specifically his “predatory” search history and the massive volume of images recovered—he was a priority for monitoring regarding his internet usage. Authorities reported that the 2020 conviction ensures his details are logged on the national police database, providing a permanent safeguard for the public and preventing any further “heinous” digital strikes.
As a registered sex offender, his details were subject to police oversight. Authorities state that Rothery’s behaviour identifies an individual who prioritised his own “warped” gratification and self-preservation over the safety and human rights of children. Any failure by Rothery to adhere to his notification requirements or his SHPO in Whitehaven or elsewhere would result in immediate police intervention to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from a man who violated the principles of human decency.
QUESTION – Given that the offender downloaded “10,000 Images” in just 16 days, do you believe that “High-Volume Offenders” should legally be subject to a mandatory minimum prison sentence, regardless of the category of the images?
If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.