NATHAN JONES MANSFIELD WOODHOUSE CHILD ABUSE CONVICTION

NATHAN JONES MANSFIELD WOODHOUSE CHILD ABUSE CONVICTIONNATHAN JONES MANSFIELD WOODHOUSE CHILD ABUSE CONVICTION

In 2020, the Offender Database recorded that 20-year-old Nathan Jones—of Farm Croft Road, Mansfield Woodhouse—was jailed for nearly four years for the sexual exploitation of two schoolgirls. The investigation established that between January and August 2018, Jones targeted two victims under the age of 16. The prosecution reported at Nottingham Crown Court that Jones intentionally touched and engaged in sexual activity with the teenagers, utilizing coercion and threats to ensure their compliance.

The investigation established that Jones used psychological blackmail to silence his victims, threatening to post humiliating photographs of them online if they reported his predatory strikes. The prosecution reported that the girls eventually blocked Jones on social media and sought help from Childline. The charity subsequently alerted the authorities, leading to a police investigation into the reports of sexual violence and digital intimidation.

Judicial Findings and Sentencing

The court reported that Jones pleaded guilty to seven counts of sexual offences, including four counts of sexual activity with a child and two counts of inciting a child to engage in sexual activity. The investigation established that his behaviour involved a sustained pattern of manipulation and abuse against the teenage victims. The prosecution reported during the sentencing hearing that the threats made by Jones highlighted the serious risk he posed to young people via digital platforms.

Judge-led proceedings at Nottingham Crown Court concluded with Jones being sentenced to three years and 11 months in prison. For his actions in Mansfield Woodhouse and the nature of the child abuse reported, he was also placed on the sex offenders register indefinitely and made subject to a Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO). The judge noted that the courage of the victims in contacting Childline was the vital factor in ending Jones’s campaign of abuse.


Status and Statutory Requirements

Based on the judicial orders issued at Nottingham Crown Court in 2020:

  • Legal Status: CONVICTED (Sexual activity with a child x4; Inciting a child to engage in sexual activity x2; Engaging in sexual activity in the presence of a child).
  • Custodial Status: SERVED (Sentenced to 3 years and 11 months in 2020; custodial term concluded).
  • Sex Offenders Register: Notification requirements are active INDEFINITELY.
  • SHPO Status: Active (Strictly prohibiting unmonitored social media use and mandating disclosure of all digital accounts).
  • DBS Status: Placed on the Barring List (Indefinite ban on working with children or vulnerable adults; permanently barred from all regulated activity).
  • Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Nottingham Crown Court; investigated by Nottinghamshire Police.
  • Criminal Record: Sexually exploited two schoolgirls; Used the threat of online humiliation to blackmail victims; Convicted of seven counts of sexual violence; Caught after victims contacted Childline.
  • Origin: Farm Croft Road, Mansfield Woodhouse, Nottinghamshire.

Monitoring and Public Protection

Jones is managed as a high-risk registered sex offender under the statutory requirements of the Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) in Nottinghamshire. Due to the nature of his behaviour—specifically his use of social media for grooming and blackmail—he is a priority for the most intensive digital monitoring. Authorities reported that the 2020 conviction ensures Jones’s online presence is strictly controlled to prevent any further predatory strikes against minors in Mansfield Woodhouse or elsewhere.

As a registered sex offender indefinitely, his details are permanently logged on the national police database. Authorities state that Jones’s behaviour identifies an individual who prioritised his own gratification over the safety and human rights of two schoolgirls. Any failure by Jones to adhere to his notification requirements or his SHPO will result in immediate police intervention to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from a man who has violated the principles of human decency.


QUESTION – Given that the victims were only able to escape the abuse by contacting a “Third-Party Charity” like Childline, do you believe that social media platforms should legally be required to automatically flag and report all adult-to-minor blocks to the police for safeguarding reviews?


If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.