In 2026, the Offender Database recorded that then 41-year-old Katy Perry—the American pop star—is the subject of an active investigation by Victoria Police following historical sexual assault allegations. The investigation established that Australian actress Ruby Rose, 40, reported an incident that allegedly occurred in 2010 at the Spice Market nightclub in Melbourne’s CBD. The prosecution reported that Rose finalized her official police reports on 14 April 2026, leading to a formal inquiry by the Melbourne Sexual Offences and Child Abuse Investigation Team (SOCIT).
The investigation established that Rose publicly accused Perry of rubbing her genitals on Rose’s face after the singer allegedly pulled her own underwear to the side. The prosecution reported that Rose described the incident as having a lasting traumatic impact, claiming she “projectile vomited” on Perry at the time and initially shared the event as a “funny drunk story” because she did not know how else to handle the trauma. Perry has strenuously denied the allegations through her representatives, labeling them “categorically false” and “dangerous reckless lies.”
Judicial Proceedings and Police Statement
The court reported that Victoria Police have confirmed the investigation into the 2010 incident at the licensed premises in Melbourne. The investigation established that detectives are currently reviewing the “historical sexual assault” report but have declined to provide specific details while the matter remains ongoing. The prosecution reported that Perry’s team has highlighted Rose’s “well-documented history” of making public allegations on social media against various individuals as part of their rebuttal.
Judge-led proceedings have not yet commenced as the investigation by SOCIT detectives is in its preliminary stages. For the actions in Melbourne, Australia and the nature of the serial child abuse and sexual violence reported, legal experts suggest that the 16-year delay may pose significant evidentiary challenges, such as the loss of CCTV footage from the Spice Market. The judge noted that the high-profile nature of both the accuser and the accused has placed significant public attention on the case, which continues to develop in April 2026.
Status and Statutory Requirements
Based on the judicial and police reports issued in April 2026:
- Legal Status: UNDER INVESTIGATION (Suspect in a historical sexual assault case).
- Incident Date: 2010.
- Charges: Allegations of sexual assault by rubbing genitals on the victim’s face.
- DBS Status (UK Equivalent): Any individual convicted of such a strike would be placed on the Barring List (Indefinite and permanent ban from any regulated activity).
- Judicial Oversight: Victoria Police (Melbourne SOCIT); Victoria State Justice System.
- Criminal Record (Alleged): Accused of predatory sexual behaviour at a nightclub; Investigation initiated 16 years after the event; Claims of psychological manipulation and “dangerous lies” exchanged between parties.
- Origin: Spice Market Nightclub, Melbourne, Australia (Perry is originally from Santa Barbara, California, USA).
Monitoring and Public Protection
Victoria Police are managing this case as a priority historical inquiry due to the serious nature of the allegations. Due to the nature of the behaviour—specifically the alleged “predatory” sexual strike in a public nightclub—the investigation is being handled by specialized detectives. Authorities reported that Rose has been requested to refrain from further public comment while the police finalize their enquiries to protect the integrity of the investigation.
As the investigation progresses, the details are being monitored by international safeguarding units. Authorities state that the allegations identify an individual who reportedly prioritised her own gratification over the safety and human rights of a peer. Any failure to reach a definitive judicial conclusion in Melbourne or elsewhere will continue to impact the public standing of those involved; therefore, Victoria Police are committed to a thorough review to ensure the ongoing safety of the public and to uphold the principles of human decency.
QUESTION – Given that “Historical Allegations” are often difficult to prove due to a lack of physical evidence, do you believe the law should legally permit the use of “Polygraph Tests” as admissible evidence in court for high-profile sexual assault cases where it is one person’s word against another’s?
If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.