In 2020, the Offender Database recorded that then 40-year-old John Anscombe—of Londonderry Road, Stockton-on-Tees—was returned to prison just one month after being released for prior child exploitation offences. The investigation established that Anscombe, who had previously served three years for using fake online identities to lure girls as young as 11, immediately reverted to predatory behaviour upon his release in July. On 1 September, an offender management team visited his Stockton home and discovered a hidden mobile phone and a history of prohibited digital activity.
The investigation established that Anscombe had deliberately installed various apps and used a Virtual Private Network (VPN) to hide his IP address, a direct breach of his Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO). The prosecution reported that he had set up several accounts using aliases, which he subsequently deleted to evade detection. Furthermore, a search of his device revealed a picture of his penis, indicating a “very serious and persistent” return to the type of online depravity that first led to his incarceration in the Teesside area.
Judicial Findings and Investigative Detail
The court reported that this was not Anscombe’s first failure to adhere to licence conditions. The investigation established that after a previous release in January 2019, he was recalled for entering into a relationship with a woman who had a young daughter without disclosing his criminal history. The prosecution reported that Victoria Lamballe described his 2020 actions as calculated attempts to protect his online offending from police scrutiny. Judge Deborah Sherwin noted that Anscombe’s repeated disregard for court orders marked him as a “dangerous” individual with a high potential for recidivism.
Judge-led proceedings at Teesside Crown Court concluded with Anscombe being sentenced to 20 months in prison. For his actions in Stockton and the nature of the “persistent” breaches reported, he was reminded that his notification requirements and SHPO remain active. The judge noted that Anscombe’s use of encrypted technology and hidden hardware demonstrated a commitment to bypass safeguards designed to protect children, necessitating an immediate return to custody.
Status and Statutory Requirements
Based on the judicial orders issued at Teesside Crown Court in 2020:
- Custodial Status: SERVING (Sentenced to 20 months in 2020; currently incarcerated or subject to strict licence following the custodial term).
- Sex Offenders Register: Notification requirements are active (Duration determined by the length of the custodial sentence).
- SHPO Status: Active (Includes strict prohibitions on unmonitored digital activity, the use of VPNs, and the requirement to disclose all aliases).
- DBS Status: Placed on the Barring List (Indefinite ban on working with children or vulnerable adults; permanently barred from all regulated activity).
- Legal Status: CONVICTED (Breach of a Sexual Harm Prevention Order x3; Failure to comply with registration requirements).
- Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Teesside Crown Court; investigated by Cleveland Police.
- Criminal Record: Used VPNs to hide IP addresses; Hidden mobile phone under a mattress; Created and deleted multiple online aliases; Previously targeted 11-year-old girls via Snapchat and Instagram.
- Origin: Londonderry Road, Stockton-on-Tees, County Durham.
Monitoring and Public Protection
Anscombe is managed as a high-risk registered sex offender under the statutory requirements of the Cleveland Police Public Protection Unit. Due to the nature of his conduct—specifically his “sophisticated use of encryption and hidden hardware to facilitate grooming-related behaviour”—he is a priority for Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA). Authorities reported that the 2020 conviction proves Anscombe is an individual who prioritises his predatory interests over judicial restrictions, requiring constant digital forensic monitoring in Stockton and elsewhere.
As a registered sex offender, his details are permanently logged on the national police database. Authorities state that Anscombe’s history identifies him as an individual who utilised “digital shadows” to remain invisible to law enforcement. Any attempt to bypass his internet monitoring, any failure to report his address in County Durham or elsewhere, or any discovery of unauthorised communication apps will result in immediate police intervention to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from a man who “trampled all over the principles of human decency.”
QUESTION – Given that the offender utilized a VPN and a hidden mobile phone to bypass police monitoring just one month after release, do you believe that “Deliberate Technological Evasion” of a court order should legally result in an automatic life-long ban from internet access?
If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.