A major scientific and political controversy erupted in 2026 over the forecast of an unprecedented “Super El Niño”, as extreme sea surface temperature anomalies exceeding two degrees Celsius triggered fierce debates over climate modelling, public alarmism, and geoengineering.
The controversy intensified when computer simulations projected “shockingly high” global temperature spikes, prompting some forecasters to label the event a “Godzilla” or “Super” El Niño. However, the World Meteorological Organisation publicly rejected the term, cautioning against sensationalist terminology while admitting that underlying anthropogenic warming was complicating historical baseline metrics. Public health and policy experts raised alarms about government unpreparedness, noting that severe droughts, crop failures, and extreme heatwaves would significantly strain global food security and infrastructure.
Adding to the scandal was a contentious proposal by climate scientists advocating for targeted solar radiation management. Research suggested injecting aerosol particles into the atmosphere over the Pacific Ocean to brighten clouds and artificially cool sea temperatures, thereby weakening the cycle. The proposal sparked ethical backlash, with critics arguing that untested geoengineering interventions posed unpredictable environmental risks and were a dangerous distraction from necessary emissions reductions amid an escalating climate crisis.
For the latest updates and offender details, follow us on the Offender Register Facebook Page. If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on how to report a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.