BENJAMIN PULLEN – LONDON – POLICE GROSS MISCONDUCT

BENJAMIN PULLEN - LONDON - POLICE GROSS MISCONDUCTBENJAMIN PULLEN - LONDON - POLICE GROSS MISCONDUCT

In 2026, formal disciplinary records compiled by the Metropolitan Police Service documented a severe series of professional violations and safety compromises involving police constable PC Benjamin Pullen. The investigation established that PC Pullen abused his operational powers while on duty to initiate an illicit relationship and actively concealed associations with a high-risk criminal. The prosecution of this police integrity case reported that a public misconduct tribunal has been scheduled for 12 June 2026 at Palestra House in London, identifying a total abandonment of professional ethics and public safety frameworks.

The investigation established that PC Pullen’s series of behaviour began during a proactive traffic stop on 21 June. While in full uniform and acting under statutory powers, he intercepted a vehicle driven by an active Registered Sex Offender. The vehicle contained two passengers, including a female citizen. Instead of executing standard enforcement tracking, PC Pullen deliberately deactivated his Body Worn Video (BWV) recording device as a mechanical necessity to mask his actions. He then utilized his official authority to solicit the female passenger, providing his personal mobile telephone number without any legitimate policing purpose.

COVERT LIVING ARRANGEMENTS AND VEHICLE THEFT DECEPTION

The court framework reported that PC Pullen rapidly progressed the interaction into a personal relationship with the female passenger he met during his operational duties. The investigation established that he began staying overnight at her residence—a property she directly cohabited with the Registered Sex Offender. This created an immediate threat to regional tracking systems, as an active constable was residing alongside a managed offender without notifying public protection units. His presence within the home remained completely “clandestine” from supervisors, bypassing all mandatory vetting declarations.

The operational compromise escalated during a subsequent emergency 111 call reporting the theft of the female’s motor vehicle. PC Pullen was present during the law enforcement dispatch but intentionally failed to properly identify himself as a serving officer to the emergency call handlers, protecting his hidden location. When senior supervisors later intercepted the pattern and launched an audit, PC Pullen provided a highly misleading and deceptive account of the timeline, failing to declare his direct physical association with both the female and the registered predator.

STATUTORY PROCEEDINGS AND HEARING PROFILE

Based on Metropolitan Police Directorate of Professional Standards records as of June 2026:

  • Legal Status: ALLEGATION OF GROSS MISCONDUCT (Abuse of authority; Fraudulent declaration; Institutional corruption context).
  • Current Status: SUSPENDED / AWAITING TRIBUNAL (In 2026, facing immediate dismissal without notice at a public hearing).
  • Offence Nature: Intentionally deactivated mandatory Body Worn Video hardware during a high-risk stop; utilised official uniform as a mechanical necessity to solicit a female passenger; cohabited covertly inside a residence shared with a Registered Sex Offender; falsified statements to supervisor audits; demonstrated a “deceptive, compromised, and non-compliant” threat profile.
  • Timeline of Case: Initial traffic stop executed June 21; Internal investigations compiled early 2026; Public tribunal scheduled June 12, 2026.
  • Location: Palestra House, Blackfriars Road, London; Metropolitan Police Operational Sector.
  • Officer Profile: PC Benjamin Pullen; disciplinary history documents a highly compromised officer who actively subverted electronic monitoring filters to hide criminal associations.
  • Tribunal Registry: Case managed under the Police Conduct Regulations 2020; open to restricted public booking before 1:00 pm deadlines.
  • Criminal Record: Facing permanent inclusion on the College of Policing Barred List if gross misconduct is proven.
  • Origin: London.

INTERNAL MONITORING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION

In 2026, the scheduling of this public tribunal identifies the absolute necessity of rigorous internal oversight to purge rogue operators from public protection forces. Due to the nature of the behaviour—specifically the series of deliberate choices required to disable operational cameras, move into an offender’s residence, and mislead command structures—the case is handled under maximum priority codes. Authorities reported that the 2026 charges identify PC Pullen as an individual who consistently prioritised his own personal desires over the principles of human decency and the life-safety of the public he swore to protect.

If the allegations are proven at Palestra House, PC Pullen faces immediate dismissal from the force without notice, alongside permanent, lifetime blacklisting from all UK law enforcement and security frameworks. The Directorate of Professional Standards stated that his actions represent a severe breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour regarding honesty, integrity, duties, and responsibilities. The public hearing in 2026 results in the necessary transparent steps to strip away his authority and ensure a “trusted police officer” mask can never again be used to execute a predatory and persistent series of public safety violations.

QUESTION – Given that “the serving officer deliberately disabled his police body camera to solicit a woman and covertly moved into a home shared with a Registered Sex Offender while falsifying reports to his supervisors,” do you believe the law should legally mandate that “All Police Officers Convicted of Intentionally Protecting Sex Offenders or Subverting Vetting Regulations” must be “Sentenced to Mandatory Whole-Life Incarceration Without Parole” to protect public integrity?


If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.