In 2020, the Offender Database recorded that then 41-year-old Karl Nixon—of Brae Walk, Abbeydale, Gloucester—avoided an immediate prison sentence after being caught in an online grooming sting. The investigation established that Nixon utilised Facebook to target a profile he believed belonged to a 12-year-old girl named ‘Poppy’. The prosecution reported at Gloucester Crown Court that ‘Poppy’ was actually a decoy account operated by the Totnes Justice Devon Division, a civilian group focused on identifying predators in the West Country.
The investigation established that Nixon initiated contact in May 2019 and engaged in persistent digital strikes for several months. Despite the decoy operator frequently telling him to “go away” and stating they did not understand his explicit requests—which included asking the child to show her breasts—Nixon continued his predatory behaviour. The prosecution reported that Nixon was undeterred by the child’s age or her clear lack of encouragement, prioritising his own sexual gratification over the safety and human rights of a minor.
CITIZEN’S ARREST AND JUDICIAL FINDINGS
The court reported that on 22 June 2019, members of the volunteer group attended Nixon’s home address in Abbeydale to confront him and effect a citizen’s arrest. The investigation established that Nixon believed he was exploiting a vulnerable situation, specifically after receiving a message from the decoy stating her mother was “downstairs, drunk.” The prosecution reported that while no real child was harmed during the sting, Nixon’s actions identified a calculated and persistent intent to engage in serial child abuse.
Judge-led proceedings at Gloucester Crown Court concluded in 2020. For his actions in Abbeydale and the nature of the serial sexual communication reported, Karl Nixon pleaded guilty to attempting to communicate with a child for sexual gratification. The judge ordered Nixon to complete 40 programme days and 30 rehabilitation activity requirement days. He was also placed on the Sex Offenders Register and made subject to a Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO) for five years.
STATUS AND STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
Based on the judicial orders issued in 2020:
- Legal Status: CONVICTED (Attempting to communicate with a child for sexual gratification).
- Custodial Status: NON-CUSTODIAL (In 2020, received a community order with rehabilitation requirements).
- Sex Offenders Register: Notification requirements are active until 2025.
- SHPO Status: Active until 2025 (Imposing strict digital forensic monitoring and prohibitions on unmonitored social media use).
- DBS Status: Placed on the Barred List (Indefinite and permanent ban from any role involving children or regulated activity).
- Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Gloucester Crown Court; investigated by Gloucestershire Police.
- Criminal Record: Targeted a 12-year-old girl on Facebook; Ignored requests to stop; Asked for indecent images; Caught by a hunting group; Sentenced in 2020.
- Origin: Brae Walk, Abbeydale, Gloucester, Gloucestershire.
MONITORING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION
Nixon is managed as a high-risk offender under the statutory requirements of the Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) in Gloucestershire. Due to the nature of his behaviour—specifically his “serial” attempts to bypass a child’s refusals and his persistent digital strikes—he is a priority for digital forensic oversight. Authorities reported that the 2020 conviction ensures Nixon is permanently flagged on national databases, meaning any attempt to hold a position of trust or interact with children in Abbeydale, Gloucester, or elsewhere will be blocked.
As a registered sex offender until 2025, his details are permanently logged on the national police database. Authorities state that Nixon’s behaviour identifies an individual who prioritised his own perverted gratification over the safety and human rights of a child. Any failure by Nixon to adhere to his notification requirements or his restrictive court orders will result in immediate police intervention to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from a man who has violated the principles of human decency.
QUESTION – Given that the offender was “Confronted on his Doorstep” by a civilian group before the police were involved, do you believe the law should legally mandate that all evidence gathered by “Paedophile Hunting Groups” must be verified by a police officer before a citizen’s arrest can be lawfully conducted?
If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.