In 2026, the Offender Database recorded that 62-year-old James Manchand—of Phoenix Street, Camden—was jailed for 20 months following a prolific upskirting campaign in London’s West End. The investigation established that on Friday, 16 January 2026, plain-clothed officers spotted Manchand pacing along queues outside busy Soho venues. The prosecution reported that uniformed officers intervened after observing Manchand hovering around groups of young women, leading to a search that exposed his status as a known sex offender with an active Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO).
The investigation established that upon inspecting his phone—as mandated by his SHPO—officers discovered 29 videos involving more than 20 victims, all filmed that same evening. The prosecution reported at Westminster Magistrates’ Court that Manchand had utilised his device to record images under the clothing of unsuspecting women without their consent. During the proceedings, it was noted that Manchand’s behaviour represented a sinister and predatory violation of privacy on a massive scale.
Judicial Findings and SHPO Breaches
The court reported that Manchand was also sentenced for a separate breach in December 2025, where he was caught using Virtual Private Network (VPN) software to erase his digital footprint. The investigation established that this action was explicitly prohibited under his SHPO to prevent him from concealing his digital strikes. The prosecution reported that Manchand was identified during a Live Facial Recognition operation on Tottenham Court Road, which confirmed he was actively circumventing police monitoring protocols.
Judge-led proceedings concluded on Friday, 10 April 2026, with Manchand being sentenced to 20 months’ imprisonment. This term included 12 months for the SHPO breaches, four months for the upskirting offences, and the activation of a further four months from a previously suspended sentence. The judge noted that Manchand’s refusal to comply with his court-ordered restrictions necessitated an immediate custodial term to protect the public and uphold the integrity of the sex offenders register.
Status and Statutory Requirements
Based on the judicial orders issued at Westminster Magistrates’ Court in 2026:
- Custodial Status: SERVING (Sentenced to 20 months in 2026; currently incarcerated).
- Sex Offenders Register: Notification requirements remain active (Mandatory for these offences).
- SHPO Status: Active (Includes strict prohibitions on VPN usage and mandates on-demand device inspection).
- DBS Status: Placed on the Barring List (Indefinite ban on working with children or vulnerable adults; permanently barred from all regulated activity).
- Legal Status: CONVICTED (Upskirting; Breach of SHPO x2).
- Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Westminster Magistrates’ Court; investigated by the Metropolitan Police.
- Criminal Record: Filmed 29 upskirting videos of 20+ victims in a single night; Caught using prohibited VPN software to hide browsing history; Breached a previously suspended sentence; Arrested following facial recognition identification.
- Origin: Phoenix Street, Camden, London (Offences occurred in Soho and Tottenham Court Road).
Monitoring and Public Protection
Manchand is managed as a high-risk registered sex offender under the statutory requirements of the Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) in London. Due to the nature of his behaviour—specifically his repeat voyeurism and his “deceptive” use of technology to bypass monitoring—he is a priority for digital forensic audits. Authorities reported that the 2026 conviction ensures Manchand remains under the most intensive supervision, providing a safeguard for women in public spaces across Camden and the West End.
As a registered sex offender, his details are permanently logged on the national police database. Authorities state that Manchand’s behaviour identifies an individual who prioritised his own gratification over the safety and human rights of dozens of women. Any failure by Manchand to adhere to his notification requirements or his SHPO conditions upon his release will result in immediate police intervention to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from a man who has violated the principles of human decency.
QUESTION – Given that the offender was identified via “Live Facial Recognition,” do you believe that “Facial Recognition Databases” should legally be used to track the movements of all registered sex offenders in real-time whenever they enter busy public areas like Soho?
If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.