In 2020, the Offender Database recorded that 37-year-old William Rennie—of Hanley, Stoke-on-Trent—was jailed for two years after repeatedly defying court orders. The investigation established that Rennie had been handed a suspended sentence earlier in the year for possessing child sexual abuse images but immediately began breaching his restrictions. The prosecution reported that Rennie failed to register multiple mobile phones and a PlayStation 3 with the police, while also installing and deleting apps popular with children, such as Kik.
The investigation established that Rennie attempted to “deceptively” mislead his offender manager by claiming he had only just purchased a new mobile number. However, digital forensics reported that the number had been active for a considerable period across three different devices. The prosecution reported that during a search on 1 May 2020, police discovered a PlayStation 3 hidden in the boot of Rennie’s car—a device he had never declared as required under his 2011 Sexual Offences Prevention Order (SOPO).
Judicial Findings and Persistent Breach
The court reported that Rennie’s conduct represented a persistent and calculated effort to bypass police monitoring. The investigation established that his use of Kik, a platform frequently used for grooming, was a direct violation of the conditions meant to protect the public. The prosecution reported that during the sentencing at Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court, Judge David Fletcher noted that Rennie was fully aware of his responsibilities but chose to ignore them, making an immediate custodial sentence inevitable.
Judge-led proceedings concluded with Rennie being sentenced to two years in prison. For his actions in Hanley and Portsmouth and the nature of the “sinister” digital activity reported, he remains on the sex offenders register for life. The judge noted that the indefinite SOPO remains in place, ensuring that upon his release, Rennie will continue to face the most stringent oversight to prevent further predatory behavior.
Status and Statutory Requirements
Based on the judicial orders issued at Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court in 2020:
- Custodial Status: SERVING (Sentenced to 2 years in 2020; currently incarcerated or on licence).
- Sex Offenders Register: Notification requirements are active FOR LIFE.
- SOPO Status: Active INDEFINITELY (Strictly prohibits possession of unregistered devices and use of unauthorized messaging apps).
- DBS Status: Placed on the Barring List (Indefinite ban on working with children or vulnerable adults; permanently barred from all regulated activity).
- Legal Status: CONVICTED (Breaching a Sexual Offences Prevention Order x5).
- Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court; monitored by Staffordshire Police.
- Criminal Record: Failed to register mobile phones and a hidden PlayStation 3; Installed and deleted Kik while on a suspended sentence; Attempted to “gaslight” his offender manager regarding device usage; Serial offender with a history of making indecent images.
- Origin: Hanley, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire (Previous convictions in Portsmouth).
Monitoring and Public Protection
Rennie is managed as a high-risk registered sex offender under the statutory requirements of the Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) in Staffordshire. Due to the nature of his conduct—specifically his persistent efforts to hide technology and access youth-oriented apps—he is a priority for unannounced home visits and digital forensic audits. Authorities reported that the 2020 conviction proves Rennie cannot be trusted with community-based sentences and requires constant supervision to ensure public safety.
As a registered sex offender for life, his details are permanently logged on the national police database. Authorities state that Rennie’s history identifies him as an individual who prioritised his own “vile” interests over the safety of children, even while under the active scrutiny of the court. Any failure by Rennie to notify police of his movements in Hanley or elsewhere, or any further attempt to conceal electronic devices, will result in immediate police intervention to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from a man who has violated the principles of human decency.
QUESTION – Given that the offender hid a gaming console in the boot of his car to avoid detection, do you believe that “Warrantless Vehicle Searches” should be legally mandatory for all sex offenders during routine police checks?
If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.