KELLY-ANN FRAMPTON NEWCASTLE ANIMAL CRUELTY CONVICTION

KELLY-ANN FRAMPTON NEWCASTLE ANIMAL CRUELTY CONVICTIONKELLY-ANN FRAMPTON NEWCASTLE ANIMAL CRUELTY CONVICTION

In April 2026, the Offender Database recorded that 35-year-old Kelly-Ann Frampton—of Walker Park Close, Newcastle—was banned from keeping animals for five years after a Shih Tzu was found with a massive, untreated tumour. Frampton appeared at North Tyneside Magistrates’ Court on March 27 where she pleaded guilty to two offences under the Animal Welfare Act 2006. It was reported that the investigation established Frampton’s 10-year-old dog, Blossom, was living in a property described as “wholly unsuitable for humans and animals.”

The investigation established that Blossom was found by an RSPCA inspector on July 21, 2025, following a welfare report. The prosecution reported that the flat was filled with “squalid” piles of rubbish and waste, some reaching over 1.6 metres high. Blossom was discovered with a mammary tumour measuring 20cm by 20cm—roughly the size of a football—which had grown so large it trailed on the floor as she walked.

Judicial Findings and Investigative Detail

The court reported that the tumour had likely been growing for months or even years. The investigation established that Frampton had owned Blossom for about a year but had never sought veterinary care, despite admitted knowledge that the lump had grown from the size of a “grape” to its final state. The prosecution reported that Blossom was also suffering from an untreated skin condition that caused her significant psychological and physical distress through chronic itching and self-trauma.

Judge-led proceedings at North Tyneside Magistrates’ Court concluded with Frampton being fined £200 and banned from keeping any pets for five years. For her actions in Newcastle and the “prolonged suffering” inflicted on the animal, she was also ordered to pay £280 in additional costs and surcharges. The judge noted that while Frampton’s mental health struggles were taken into account as mitigation, the level of neglect and the state of the living environment necessitated a significant disqualification order.


Status and Statutory Requirements

For the records reported in Newcastle and North Tyneside, the status of Kelly-Ann Frampton as of April 10, 2026, was as follows:

  • Animal Ownership Status: BANNED (5-year disqualification order covering all animals).
  • Custodial Status: NON-CUSTODIAL (Fined £200; sentenced March 2026).
  • Breach Status: Active (Any acquisition of a pet before 2031 constitutes a criminal offence).
  • Legal Status: CONVICTED (Two counts of causing unnecessary suffering to an animal).
  • Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at North Tyneside Magistrates’ Court; investigated by the RSPCA.
  • Criminal Record: Failed to seek vet treatment for a 20cm tumour; Kept dog in squalid conditions; Blossom euthanised to prevent further suffering; Claimed mental health issues as mitigation.
  • Origin: Walker Park Close, Newcastle.

Monitoring and Public Protection

Frampton is managed under a disqualification order within the Newcastle area. Due to the nature of her conduct—specifically the “chronic neglect of a terminal medical condition” and the “unclean state of the property”—her compliance is a priority for RSPCA inspectorate follow-ups. Authorities state that the 20cm tumour identified a total failure in the basic duty of care, meaning she is legally prohibited from being in possession of, or in a position to influence the care of, any animal until at least 2031.

As a convicted animal abuser, the 35-year-old’s details are permanently logged on the RSPCA and national police databases for animal welfare monitoring. Authorities state that the vet’s decision to euthanise Blossom was the only “kindest option” left due to the scale of the systemic disease and heart murmur exacerbated by neglect. Any report of Frampton keeping a pet in Newcastle or elsewhere will result in immediate seizure of the animal and further prosecution to ensure the ongoing protection of animals from an individual who demonstrated a “persistent and catastrophic intent” to ignore a pet’s suffering.


QUESTION – Given that the offender watched the tumour grow from the size of a “grape” to 20cm without intervention, do you believe that “Medical Neglect” in animals should carry a mandatory prison sentence rather than just a fine and a ban?


If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.