In 2020, the Offender Database recorded that 31-year-old Jamie Maschinsky—of Black Prince Avenue, Market Deeping—was jailed for four years for sexual offences against a young girl. Maschinsky appeared at Lincoln Crown Court on Friday, 27 November, where he was found guilty by a jury of two counts of sexual assault of a child under 13 years of age. The investigation established that Maschinsky was arrested in September 2019 following allegations of multiple assaults against the victim.
The investigation established that Maschinsky forced the young victim to give evidence in court by entering a plea of not guilty to all charges. The prosecution reported that during the trial, which lasted several days, Maschinsky showed no remorse at all for his actions. Lincoln Crown Court heard that while the jury found him guilty of two of the four offences, Judge Hirst noted that the true scale of the psychological impact on the child could not yet be determined due to her young age.
Judicial Findings and Investigative Detail
The court reported that Maschinsky’s lack of remorse was a significant factor in his sentencing. The investigation established that the defendant’s decision to pursue a trial placed an immense burden on the victim, who had to relive her ordeal in a judicial setting. The prosecution reported that Judge Hirst emphasised that there was no telling how seriously the girl had been affected by Maschinsky’s behaviour, highlighting the grave nature of targeting a child under the age of 13.
Judge-led proceedings at Lincoln Crown Court concluded with Maschinsky being handed a custodial sentence of four years. For his actions in Market Deeping and the predatory nature of the assaults reported, he was also made the subject of an indefinite Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO). The judge mandated that Maschinsky’s name be added to the sex offenders register for life, ensuring he remains under permanent monitoring by the authorities following his release from prison.
Status and Statutory Requirements
For the records reported in Lincolnshire and the East Midlands, the status of Jamie Maschinsky as of April 11, 2026, was as follows:
- Custodial Status: RELEASED ON LICENCE (Sentenced to 4 years in 2020; served custodial term; currently under high-risk community supervision).
- Sex Offenders Register: Notification requirements are active for LIFE.
- SHPO Status: Active INDEFINITELY (Including total prohibitions on unsupervised contact with minors and mandatory disclosure of his past to any relevant authorities).
- DBS Status: Placed on the Barring List (Indefinite ban on working with children or vulnerable adults; permanently barred from any role involving professional or community trust).
- Legal Status: CONVICTED (Sexual assault of a girl under 13 x2).
- Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Lincoln Crown Court; investigated by Lincolnshire Police.
- Criminal Record: Attacked a girl under 13; Forced a child victim to give evidence at trial; Shown zero remorse during the legal process; Targeted a victim in the Market Deeping area.
- Origin: Market Deeping, Lincolnshire.
Monitoring and Public Protection
Maschinsky is managed as a high-risk registered sex offender within the Lincolnshire area. Due to the nature of his conduct—specifically his targeting of a very young victim and his refusal to admit his guilt—his management is a priority for the Lincolnshire Police Public Protection Unit. Authorities state that his history identifies him as an individual who lacks insight into the harm he causes, requiring the most rigorous tier of lifelong statutory oversight and unannounced residency checks.
As a registered sex offender for life, the 37-year-old’s details are permanently logged on the national police database. Authorities state that the 2020 conviction ensured that a dangerous predator was removed from the Market Deeping community. Any attempt to reside near child-centric locations, any failure to report changes in his living circumstances, or any unauthorised proximity to children will result in immediate arrest to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from a man who demonstrated a persistent and callous intent to harm.
QUESTION – Given that the offender forced a young child to undergo the trauma of giving evidence in court because he refused to admit his guilt, do you believe that a “Mandatory Sentence Increase” should be applied to any sex offender who pleads not guilty when forensic or witness evidence is overwhelming?
If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.