DYLAN ROBSON SOUTH SHIELDS PAEDOPHILE CHILD SEX OFFENDER

DYLAN ROBSON SOUTH SHIELDS PAEDOPHILE CHILD SEX OFFENDERDYLAN ROBSON SOUTH SHIELDS PAEDOPHILE CHILD SEX OFFENDER

In 2018, the Offender Database recorded that 30-year-old Dylan Robson was spared an immediate prison sentence despite possessing a sickening collection of child abuse images featuring babies as young as six months old. Robson—of Belle Vue Crescent, South Shields, Tyne and Wear—was sentenced at Newcastle Crown Court. It was reported that the investigation was launched in October 2017 when the Northumbria Police paedophile investigation team raided his home and seized two computer hard drives and two mobile phones.

The investigation established that Robson had been accessing child abuse images for approximately seven years. Newcastle Crown Court heard that his collection contained 2,670 movies and pictures across all three categories of seriousness (A, B, and C). The prosecution reported that the material depicted toddlers and infants being abused by adults, including horrific scenes of an adult male wearing a hood attacking a child and an adult female abusing a baby.

Judicial Findings and Investigative Detail

The court reported that the victims depicted in Robson’s collection ranged in age from six months to 14 years. Newcastle Crown Court heard that Robson admitted to three offences of possessing indecent images of children. The investigation established that although the crimes were severe, the judicial response focused on rehabilitation, with Judge Amanda Rippon stating that every baby and toddler Robson watched was his victim, regardless of whether he personally touched them.

Judge Amanda Rippon presided over the sentencing, handing Robson a 12-month prison sentence, suspended for two years. For his actions in South Shields, he was also ordered to complete specific rehabilitation programmes and sign the Sex Offenders Register for 10 years. The judge noted that while the younger victims were oblivious to the recording equipment, the older children were well aware of their exploitation, making Robson’s long-term consumption of this material a persistent danger to the public.


Status and Statutory Requirements

For the records reported in Tyne and Wear, the status of Dylan Robson as of April 5, 2026, was as follows:

  • Custodial Status: RELEASED (Served 12-month suspended sentence; sentenced 2018; expired 2020).
  • Sex Offenders Register: Notification requirements are active until 2028 (10-year term).
  • SHPO Status: Sexual Harm Prevention Order active until 2028.
  • DBS Status: Placed on the Barring List (Indefinite ban on working with children).
  • Legal Status: CONVICTED (Possessing indecent images of children; Categories A, B, and C; 3 counts).
  • Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Newcastle Crown Court; investigated by Northumbria Police.
  • Criminal Record: Possession of images of 6-month-old infants; 7-year history of accessing abuse material; Use of multiple hard drives and phones.
  • Origin: Belle Vue Crescent, South Shields, Tyne and Wear.

Monitoring and Public Protection

Robson is managed as a registered sex offender within the South Shields and South Tyneside area. Due to the nature of his conduct—which involved a seven-year habit of viewing extreme abuse of infants and toddlers—his management is a priority for the Northumbria Police Public Protection Unit. Authorities state that his history of using multiple devices to store thousands of illegal files requires consistent digital monitoring and unannounced inspections of any internet-enabled hardware in his possession.

As a registered sex offender until 2028, the (then) 30-year-old’s details are permanently logged on the national police database. Authorities state that his 10-year SHPO includes strict restrictions on his ability to delete internet history or use encrypted messaging apps. Any failure to notify police of his movements in South Shields, any attempt to acquire unmonitored storage devices, or any reports of him accessing further abuse material will result in immediate arrest and potential activation of a custodial sentence to ensure the ongoing safety of the public.


QUESTION – Given that the offender spent seven years watching the abuse of infants as young as six months but avoided an immediate jail term, do you believe that “Automatic Custody” should be the mandatory legal requirement for anyone found with Category A images, regardless of their perceived potential for rehabilitation?


If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.