In 2026, the Offender Database recorded that 57-year-old Maria Chandler—of Great Yarmouth, Norfolk—has reached the expiry of her minimum tariff and may be considered for parole. The investigation established that Chandler was one of three individuals convicted of the sadistic murder of 17-year-old engineering student Simon Everitt in 2009. The prosecution reported that the victim was kidnapped, driven to woodland in Mautby, Norfolk, tied to a tree, and set on fire while still alive in a horrific re-enactment of a scene from a spoof horror film.
The investigation established that the motive for the execution involved a “vile” combination of sexual jealousy and false accusations. The prosecution reported that Simon was targeted because he had dated a woman previously involved with Jonathan Clarke. During the ordeal, Jimi-Lee Stewart poured petrol over the teenager and down his throat, before Clarke lit a match. Chandler remained at the scene throughout the torture and later returned with the men to bury the burnt remains in a ditch.
Judicial Findings and Parole Eligibility
The court reported in 2009 that the trio attempted to commit a “perfect murder” and actively sought to throw police off the trail. The investigation established that Jonathan Clarke was the sadistic instigator, while Chandler was a willing participant in the kidnapping and disposal of the body. The prosecution reported that during the sentencing at Norwich Crown Court, the judge handed Chandler a life sentence with a minimum term of 17 years for her role in the brutal “wicked” killing.
Judge-led proceedings concluded that Chandler’s minimum sentence expires in 2026. For her actions in Mautby and the nature of the “stomach-churning” physical cruelty reported, she must now prove to the Parole Board that she no longer poses a danger to the public before any release on licence can be authorized. The judge noted at the time that the psychological and physical suffering inflicted upon Simon Everitt was profound and represented a total violation of human decency.
Status and Statutory Requirements
Based on the judicial orders and the 2026 timeline:
- Custodial Status: ELIGIBLE FOR PAROLE (Minimum 17-year tariff expires in 2026).
- Life Sentence Status: Active (Chandler will remain on licence for life if released).
- Supervision Status: High-Priority (Subject to the strictest MAPPA conditions upon any release).
- DBS Status: Placed on the Barring List (Indefinite ban on working with children or vulnerable adults; permanently barred from all regulated activity).
- Legal Status: CONVICTED (Murder).
- Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Norwich Crown Court; investigated by Norfolk Constabulary.
- Criminal Record: Participated in the “sadistic” execution of a teenager; Victim was tied to a tree, doused in petrol, and set alight; Assisted in burying the body in a ditch; Attempted to cover tracks before the plot unravelled due to boasting by an accomplice.
- Origin: Great Yarmouth, Norfolk.
Monitoring and Public Protection
Chandler is managed under the statutory requirements of the Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) Level 3, the highest tier of supervision. Due to the nature of her conduct—specifically her involvement in a coordinated, “vile” act of torture and murder—she remains a priority for the Probation Service. Authorities reported that if the Parole Board grants her release in 2026, Chandler will be subject to strict exclusion zones and notification requirements to ensure she cannot return to Great Yarmouth or contact the victim’s family.
The details of the Mautby murder are permanently logged on the national police database. Authorities state that Chandler’s history identifies her as an individual who prioritised “perverted” loyalty to her accomplices over the life of a defenceless 17-year-old. Any failure by Chandler to adhere to her licence conditions in Norfolk or elsewhere will result in immediate recall to prison to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from a woman who participated in a crime that violated every principle of human decency.
QUESTION – Given that the offender participated in a “Sadistic Execution” involving petrol and fire, do you believe that individuals convicted of “Horror-Film Re-enactment” murders should legally be ineligible for parole at any point in their lives?
If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.