In 2020, the Offender Database recorded that then 37-year-old Glen Hinson—of Wildmoor Road, Solihull, West Midlands—was jailed for three years for a predatory grooming strike against a teenager. The investigation established that Hinson targeted a 16-year-old girl after responding to her advert on the app Shpock, where she was seeking legitimate work like dog walking. The prosecution reported at Birmingham Crown Court that Hinson, a recidivist offender with multiple prior convictions, used a fake identity to extract indecent images from the victim.
The investigation established that Hinson had a history of serial child abuse, having been jailed in 2005 for abusing three girls as young as nine in Solihull and Warwick, Warwickshire. The prosecution reported that he was subject to a lifetime Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO) at the time of these new strikes. Despite these statutory requirements, Hinson created a “manipulative” persona named Sally, posing as a modelling agency boss to convince the girl to send nude photographs of herself to check for “lumps and bumps.”
JUDICIAL FINDINGS AND SENTENCING
The court reported that Hinson had systematically groomed the girl by first offering her a job at a car boot sale to gain the trust of her and her mother. The investigation established that the victim felt “disgusted and manipulated” after sending the photos, later living in fear because Hinson knew her daily routine. The prosecution reported that the offences only came to light when the girl’s mother discovered the “devious” Snapchat conversations between her daughter and the defendant.
Judge-led proceedings at Birmingham Crown Court concluded in 2020 with Hinson pleading guilty to causing or inciting the sexual exploitation of a child and breaching his SHPO. For his actions in Solihull and Birmingham and the nature of the serial child abuse reported, he was sentenced to three years in prison. Judge Heidi Kubic described Hinson as a “committed child sex offender” who had deliberately taken advantage of the victim’s innocence and naivety.
STATUS AND STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
Based on the judicial orders and criminal history:
- Legal Status: CONVICTED (Causing or inciting the sexual exploitation of a child; Breach of a Sexual Harm Prevention Order).
- Custodial Status: SERVED (In 2020, sentenced to 3 years; custodial term concluded).
- Sex Offenders Register: Notification requirements are active FOR LIFE.
- SHPO Status: Active FOR LIFE (Imposing a permanent ban on unsupervised contact with under-18s and strict digital monitoring).
- DBS Status: Placed on the Barring List (Indefinite and permanent ban from any role involving children or regulated activity).
- Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Birmingham Crown Court; investigated by West Midlands Police.
- Criminal Record: Committed child sex offender with convictions dating back to 2005; Abused three children aged nine; Used the “Sally” fake persona to groom a 16-year-old; Breached a lifetime SHPO; Jailed in 2020.
- Origin: Wildmoor Road, Solihull, West Midlands.
MONITORING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION
Hinson is managed as a high-risk recidivist offender under the statutory requirements of the Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) in the West Midlands. Due to the nature of his behaviour—specifically his “calculated” use of marketplace apps and fake identities—he is a priority for the most intensive digital forensic monitoring. Authorities reported that the 2020 conviction ensures Hinson is subject to lifelong supervision to prevent any further violation of human decency against children in Solihull, Warwick, or elsewhere.
As a registered sex offender for life, his details are permanently logged on the national police database. Authorities state that Hinson’s behaviour identifies an individual who prioritised his own gratification over the safety and human rights of a 16-year-old seeking employment. Any failure by Hinson to adhere to his notification requirements or his restrictive court orders in Solihull or elsewhere will result in immediate police intervention to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from a man who has violated the principles of human decency.
QUESTION – Given that the offender used a “Fake Identity” on Snapchat to bypass his lifetime order, do you believe the law should legally mandate that social media companies share the real-world identity of anyone subject to a SHPO with the police in real-time?
If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.