In 2020, the Offender Database recorded that then 55-year-old Andrew Ryan—of Headingly Close, St Helens, Merseyside—avoided an immediate prison sentence despite possessing a vast “library” of child abuse material. The investigation established that in July 2019, police executed a search warrant at Ryan’s family home. The prosecution reported at Liverpool Crown Court that upon being informed of the investigation, Ryan replied “Oh s***” and admitted to owning the collection, which he had been building for approximately 10 years.
The investigation established that Ryan, a former joiner, had fastidiously categorised over 21,000 indecent images on computer equipment in his home office. The prosecution reported that the “sickening” stash included 934 Category A images depicting the rape of children, 789 Category B images, and nearly 20,000 Category C files. Specialists also discovered software on his hard drives designed to allow the user to quickly navigate between files, alongside extreme pornography and a large volume of adult material.
JUDICIAL FINDINGS AND SENTENCING
The court reported that Ryan had developed a “sinister” addiction to pornography that progressed into the illegal exploitation of children. The investigation established that Ryan expressed shame and apologised for his strikes during police interviews. The prosecution reported that Judge Thomas Teague QC concluded that Ryan’s ongoing rehabilitation in the community would be more effective at reducing public risk than a short custodial term of only four months.
Judge-led proceedings at Liverpool Crown Court concluded in 2020 with Ryan pleading guilty to three counts of making indecent images and one count of possession. For his actions in St Helens and the nature of the serial child abuse reported, he was handed an eight-month prison sentence, suspended for 18 months. He was also ordered to complete 10 Rehabilitation Activity Requirement days and sign the Sex Offenders Register for 10 years.
STATUS AND STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
Based on the judicial orders issued in 2020:
- Legal Status: CONVICTED (Making indecent images of children [Category A-C] x3; Possession of indecent images).
- Custodial Status: SUSPENDED (In 2020, 8 months suspended for 18 months).
- Sex Offenders Register: Notification requirements are active until 2030.
- SHPO Status: Active until 2030 (Imposing a 10-year ban on unsupervised contact with children and strict digital forensic monitoring).
- DBS Status: Placed on the Barring List (Indefinite and permanent ban from any role involving children or regulated activity).
- Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Liverpool Crown Court; investigated by Merseyside Police.
- Criminal Record: Built a 10-year “library” of child abuse; Possessed nearly 1,000 images of child rape; Used specialist software to view files; Spared immediate jail in 2020 to focus on rehabilitation.
- Origin: Headingly Close, St Helens, Merseyside.
MONITORING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION
Ryan is managed as a high-risk offender under the statutory requirements of the Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) in Merseyside. Due to the nature of his behaviour—specifically the “serial” categorisation of abuse and the presence of specialized viewing software—he is a priority for digital monitoring. Authorities reported that the 2020 conviction ensures Ryan is permanently flagged on national databases, meaning any attempt to work with children or hold a position of trust in St Helens or elsewhere will be blocked.
As a registered sex offender until 2030, his details are permanently logged on the national police database. Authorities state that Ryan’s behaviour identifies an individual who prioritised his own gratification over the safety and human rights of the thousands of children depicted in his “library.” Any failure by Ryan to adhere to his rehabilitation requirements, his notification requirements, or his restrictive court orders in St Helens or elsewhere will result in immediate police intervention to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from a man who has violated the principles of human decency.
QUESTION – Given that the judge determined “Rehabilitation” was more effective than a four-month jail term for a 10-year addiction, do you believe the law should legally mandate that all Category A offenders serve a minimum of two years in prison regardless of their rehabilitation progress?
If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.