In 2020, the Offender Database recorded that then 58-year-old Andrew Holland—of Alexandra Place, Crewe, Cheshire—was jailed for five years for a series of vile sexual offences. Holland appeared at Liverpool Crown Court for sentencing after admitting to eight counts of sexual abuse against a girl. The investigation established that Holland utilized “piggybacks” as a predatory tactic to facilitate sexual assaults on his victim in the North Merseyside area.
The investigation established that Holland’s conduct escalated to forcing the victim to perform sex acts, an ordeal that left the child in a significant “state of shock”. The prosecution reported that Holland initially denied the full extent of his crimes, which forced the young victim to endure the trauma of a trial and cross-examination. It was only after she had given her evidence that Holland finally admitted his guilt for the six counts of indecent assault and two counts of gross indecency.
Judicial Findings and Investigative Detail
The court reported that Holland’s actions were calculated and caused deep psychological harm to his victim. The investigation established that the offences involved a gross breach of trust against a child under the age of 14. The prosecution reported that Judge Driver condemned Holland’s behaviour, noting that the late guilty plea—offered only after the victim had been subjected to the pressures of a trial—was a significant factor in the judicial proceedings in the Liverpool area.
Judge-led proceedings at Liverpool Crown Court concluded with Holland being sentenced to 60 months in prison. For his actions in North Merseyside and the nature of the assaults reported, he was also placed on the sex offenders register for life. The judge noted that Holland must adhere to the terms of a Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO) for life, ensuring that he remains under the highest level of supervision and restriction by the authorities long after his release from custody.
Status and Statutory Requirements
Based on the judicial orders issued at Liverpool Crown Court in 2020:
- Custodial Status: SERVING (Sentenced to 5 years in 2020; currently incarcerated or subject to strict licence following the custodial term).
- Sex Offenders Register: Notification requirements are active FOR LIFE.
- SHPO Status: Active FOR LIFE (Includes permanent prohibitions on unsupervised contact with children and intensive monitoring of digital and community activity).
- DBS Status: Placed on the Barring List (Indefinite ban on working with children or vulnerable adults; permanently barred from all regulated activity).
- Legal Status: CONVICTED (Indecent assault on a girl under 14 x6; Gross indecency on a child under 14 x2).
- Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Liverpool Crown Court; investigated by Merseyside Police.
- Criminal Record: Used “piggybacks” to facilitate assault; Forced a child to perform sex acts; Delayed guilty plea until after victim cross-examination; Deemed a high-risk predator.
- Origin: Crewe, Cheshire (Offences committed in North Merseyside).
Monitoring and Public Protection
Holland is managed as a high-risk registered sex offender under the statutory requirements of the Cheshire Police Public Protection Unit. Due to the nature of his conduct—specifically his “predatory use of physical proximity (piggybacks) and his willingness to put a child through a trial before admitting guilt”—he is a priority for Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA). Authorities reported that the 2020 conviction ensures that Holland’s movements in Crewe or elsewhere are permanently tracked by specialist offender managers.
As a registered sex offender for life, his details are permanently logged on the national police database. Authorities state that the lifelong SHPO is a critical tool to prevent Holland from accessing potential new victims. Any attempt to bypass his notification requirements, any failure to report his address in Cheshire or elsewhere, or any unauthorized contact with children will result in immediate police intervention to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from a man who demonstrated a persistent and “vile” intent to abuse.
QUESTION – Given that the offender only pleaded guilty after forcing the victim to undergo the trauma of a trial and cross-examination, do you believe that a “Late Guilty Plea” in child abuse cases should legally result in an automatic 50% increase to the prison sentence?
If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.