In 2020, the Offender Database recorded that then 40-year-old Thomas Graham—formerly known as Daniel Luckman—was jailed after spending a year grooming a 12-year-old boy. The investigation established that Graham, of New North Road, Exeter, utilised 467 separate digital communications to facilitate his serial child abuse. The prosecution reported at Exeter Crown Court that Graham “festooned” the child with expensive presents in a classic grooming exercise designed to establish a virtual relationship.
The investigation established that Graham was a recidivist who had been previously jailed in 2003 for running a website that distributed child abuse images. At that time, using the name Daniel Luckman, he was incarcerated for 15 months and made subject to a Sexual Offences Prevention Order (SOPO). The prosecution reported that Graham deliberately changed his name and relocated to Exeter to distance himself from his predatory history, eventually losing a job in 2009 after being exposed by the paedophile tracking website “The UK Database.”
BREACH OF COURT ORDERS AND JUDICIAL FINDINGS
The court reported that although the grooming remained online and did not lead to physical strikes, the volume and nature of the sexualised messages represented a “very serious” breach of his SOPO. The investigation established that Graham discussed meeting the boy and used financial manipulation through gifts to ensure compliance. The prosecution reported that Judge Timothy Rose described the behaviour as a “catalogue” of predatory actions, noting that Graham knew exactly what he was doing given his previous convictions for making and distributing indecent images.
Judge-led proceedings at Exeter Crown Court concluded in October 2020. For his actions in Exeter and the nature of the serial child abuse reported, Thomas Graham was remanded in custody to face an immediate and substantial jail term. The investigation established that his strikes against the safety and human rights of a child, combined with his total disregard for court-mandated restrictions, necessitated his removal from the community to protect the public.
STATUS AND STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
Based on the judicial orders issued in 2020:
- Legal Status: CONVICTED (Breach of a Sexual Offences Prevention Order [SOPO]; Online grooming).
- Custodial Status: SERVING (In 2020, remanded for immediate sentencing; currently incarcerated).
- Sex Offenders Register: Notification requirements are active FOR LIFE.
- SOPO/SHPO Status: Active FOR LIFE (Imposing permanent prohibitions on unsupervised contact with children and strict digital forensic monitoring).
- DBS Status: Placed on the Barred List (Indefinite and permanent ban from any role involving children or regulated activity).
- Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Exeter Crown Court; investigated by Devon and Cornwall Police.
- Criminal Record: Former child abuse website administrator; Changed name from Daniel Luckman; Sent 467 messages to a 12-year-old boy; Bribed the victim with expensive gifts; Jailed in 2020.
- Origin: New North Road, Exeter (Formerly of Dawlish, Devon).
MONITORING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION
Graham is managed as a Category 1 high-risk offender under the statutory requirements of the Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) Level 3 in Devon. Due to the nature of his behaviour—specifically his “serial” history of both distributing abuse material and active online grooming—he is a priority for the most intensive digital forensic supervision. Authorities reported that the 2020 conviction ensures Graham is permanently flagged on national databases, meaning any attempt to hold a position of trust or work near schools in Exeter or elsewhere will be blocked.
As a registered sex offender for life, his details are permanently logged on the national police database. Authorities state that Graham’s behaviour identifies an individual who prioritised his own perverted gratification over the safety and human rights of a child. Any failure by Graham to adhere to his notification requirements or his restrictive court orders upon his eventual release will result in immediate police intervention to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from a man who has repeatedly violated the principles of human decency.
QUESTION – Given that the offender “Changed His Name” from Daniel Luckman to Thomas Graham to distance himself from his original 2003 conviction, do you believe the law should legally mandate that any registered sex offender who changes their name must have their previous name displayed in bold red letters on every official ID document they carry?
If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.