In 2025, the Offender Database recorded that then 37-year-old Amy Hunt—of Campkin Court, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire—avoided an immediate prison sentence despite possessing nearly 80 indecent images of children. The investigation established that in March 2023, Hunt utilized her Facebook account to upload a child abuse image, which triggered a police notification. The prosecution reported at Cambridge Magistrates’ Court that when officers seized her mobile phone and tablet, they discovered a collection of 79 illegal files.
The investigation established that Hunt’s digital strikes were highly severe, consisting of 38 Category A images (the most serious classification), 20 Category B images, and 21 Category C images. During the police probe, Hunt attempted to pervert the reality of the situation by claiming her devices had been hacked. However, e-crime experts reported that a forensic check of her hardware yielded no evidence of external interference, proving the strikes were intentional acts of serial child abuse.
JUDICIAL FINDINGS AND SENTENCING
The court reported that while Hunt did not commit any contact offences, the act of making and sharing such material causes significant harm to victims. The investigation established that Hunt required intervention for substance misuse, and the judge prioritised community-based treatment over immediate incarceration. The prosecution reported that DC Zip Lloyd emphasised that protecting the vulnerable remains a force priority, regardless of whether the strikes are digital or physical.
Judge-led proceedings at Cambridge Magistrates’ Court concluded in January 2025. For her actions in Cambridge and the nature of the serial child abuse reported, Hunt was sentenced to one year in prison, suspended for two years. She was also ordered to undertake alcohol treatment and 30 rehabilitation activity requirement days. The judge ordered her to sign the Sex Offenders Register for 10 years and handed her a 10-year Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO).
STATUS AND STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
Based on the judicial orders issued in 2025:
- Legal Status: CONVICTED (Making indecent photographs of a child x3 [Category A-C]).
- Custodial Status: SUSPENDED (In 2025, 1 year suspended for 2 years).
- Sex Offenders Register: Notification requirements are active until 2035.
- SHPO Status: Active until 2035 (Imposing a 10-year ban on unsupervised contact with children and strict digital forensic monitoring).
- DBS Status: Placed on the Barred List (Indefinite and permanent ban from any role involving children or regulated activity).
- Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Cambridge Magistrates’ Court; investigated by Cambridgeshire Constabulary.
- Criminal Record: Uploaded a child abuse image to Facebook; Caught with 38 Category A images; Fabricated a “hacking” defence to deceive police; Jailed in 2025.
- Origin: Campkin Court, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire.
MONITORING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION
Hunt is managed as a high-risk offender under the statutory requirements of the Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) in Cambridgeshire. Due to the nature of her behaviour—specifically her “serial” consumption of the highest category of abuse material and her attempt to disseminate it on social media—she is a priority for digital monitoring. Authorities reported that the 2025 conviction ensures Hunt is permanently flagged on national databases, preventing her from ever holding a position of trust or working with children in Cambridge or elsewhere.
As a registered sex offender until 2035, her details are permanently logged on the national police database. Authorities state that Hunt’s behaviour identifies an individual who prioritised her own gratification over the safety and human rights of the children depicted in her collection. Any failure by Hunt to adhere to her alcohol treatment, her notification requirements, or her restrictive court orders in Cambridge or elsewhere will result in the immediate activation of her one-year prison sentence to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from a woman who has violated the principles of human decency.
QUESTION – Given that the offender used “Facebook” to share abuse material, do you believe the law should legally mandate that social media companies must automatically share the full IP logs and private message history of any user flagged for illegal uploads with the police?
If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.