In 2026, the Offender Database recorded that then PC Ben Bayley-Cook—formerly based in the Dartford area of Kent—was sacked without notice following a comprehensive misconduct investigation. The investigation established that Bayley-Cook, who joined Kent Police in January 2022, engaged in a prolific campaign of sexual harassment and professional misconduct within months of entering the force. A misconduct panel led by Assistant Chief Officer Andy Pritchard upheld 11 out of 12 allegations, describing his behaviour as establishing a “degrading, humiliating, and offensive environment.”
The investigation established that Bayley-Cook’s predatory conduct targeted both colleagues and vulnerable members of the public. The prosecution reported that after attending a domestic abuse incident, the officer admitted he “couldn’t stop looking” at the victim’s breasts. Furthermore, the tribunal heard evidence of his preference for “skimpily dressed drunk females” and offensive remarks regarding a woman injured in a road collision, whom he described in sexualised terms.
Misconduct Findings and Professional Impact
The court reported that Bayley-Cook’s behaviour was marked by the persistent display of intimate images, including photographs of his own genitals and anus, to fellow officers. The investigation established that one female officer, PC A, was a direct victim of sexual harassment, which eventually led to her resignation from Kent Police to pursue her career overseas. The prosecution reported that Bayley-Cook made unsettling remarks to colleagues about masturbating before work and frequently bragged about his genitals, even displaying his testicles to staff while claiming “they’re quite big.”
Judge-led protocols for police integrity resulted in Bayley-Cook’s immediate dismissal in April 2026. For his actions in Dartford and the nature of the “sinister” harassment reported, he has been added to the College of Policing’s Barred List. The panel noted that his version of events—where he claimed colleagues had “conspired” against him—was entirely dismissed, emphasizing that his presence in the force was a direct threat to the principles of human decency and public safety.
Status and Statutory Requirements
Based on the misconduct panel findings and the dismissal in 2026:
- Professional Status: DISMISSED (Sacked without notice in April 2026).
- Barred List Status: ACTIVE (Indefinite ban on serving in any UK police force or law enforcement agency).
- DBS/Vetting Status: Flagged (Misconduct findings are a permanent part of his professional record, disclosable on all future vetting checks).
- Legal Status: DISGRACED (Dismissed for Gross Misconduct involving sexual harassment and bringing the force into disrepute).
- Judicial Oversight: Kent Police Misconduct Panel; Assistant Chief Officer Andy Pritchard.
- Criminal Record: N/A (Disposed of via professional misconduct hearings; involves persistent sexual harassment and professional malpractice).
- Origin: Dartford, Kent.
Monitoring and Public Protection
Bayley-Cook is now permanently excluded from any role involving public trust or law enforcement under the statutory requirements of the College of Policing. Due to the nature of his conduct—specifically his “sexualisation of domestic abuse victims and the harassment of female colleagues”—he is identified as an individual whose behaviour fell dangerously below the required standards. Authorities reported that his dismissal ensures that a man who viewed the public as “targets” for sexualised commentary is no longer in a position of authority in Kent or elsewhere.
As a barred officer, his details are permanently logged on the national police barred list. Authorities state that Bayley-Cook’s history identifies him as an individual who utilised his position to facilitate a hostile and predatory atmosphere. Any attempt by Bayley-Cook to re-enter regulated activity or any report of further harassment will be a matter of public concern. The investigation established that Kent Police remains committed to rooting out such “vile” behaviour to ensure the safety of both the public and their own personnel.
QUESTION – Given that this officer’s predatory behaviour began “just months after he joined,” do you believe that the vetting process for new recruits should be legally changed to include mandatory psychological profiling and the forensic monitoring of private social media accounts for the first two years of service?
If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.