JOHN MUSHING LEICESTER PAEDOPHILE HUNTER CONVICTION

JOHN MUSHING LEICESTER PAEDOPHILE HUNTER CONVICTIONJOHN MUSHING LEICESTER PAEDOPHILE HUNTER CONVICTION

In 2018, the Offender Database recorded that John Mushing—of Leicester—was convicted of sexual communication with a child after being caught in an undercover sting operation. It was reported that the investigation established Mushing had targeted an online profile he believed belonged to a 13-year-old girl. Mushing appeared at court following his apprehension by a paedophile hunting team on 26 May 2018.

The investigation established that Mushing used a “teaching” persona to groom the decoy profile, providing graphic instructions on sexual acts. The prosecution reported that Mushing’s behaviour escalated to arranging a physical meeting, during which he discussed the morning-after pill for the child, demonstrating a clear intent to facilitate sexual activity. However, the child did not exist; the profile was managed by the “Derbyshire Hunting Squad” acting on behalf of “Decoy Central.”

Judicial Findings and Investigative Detail

The court reported that Mushing’s conduct was a calculated effort to exploit a minor, characterized by persistent and highly sexualized communication. The investigation established that upon arriving at the agreed meeting location, Mushing was confronted by members of the hunting team who questioned him regarding his digital activity before summoning the police. The prosecution reported that Mushing was subsequently arrested and charged under the Serious Crime Act, which covers sexual communication intended for sexual gratification.

Judge-led proceedings concluded with Mushing’s conviction, with the case adjourned for a full sentencing hearing at a later date. For his actions in Leicester and the wider digital space, he faced a custodial sentence and mandatory placement on the sex offenders register. The judge noted that the level of detail in his “lessons” to the child and his preparations for a physical encounter identified him as a high-risk individual who required statutory intervention.


Status and Statutory Requirements

For the records reported in Leicestershire, the status of John Mushing as of April 7, 2026, was as follows:

  • Custodial Status: RELEASED (Served custodial term/suspended sentence; sentenced 2018; released on licence circa 2019).
  • Sex Offenders Register: Notification requirements are active until 2028 (standard 10-year period).
  • SHPO Status: Subject to a Sexual Harm Prevention Order (Strictly limiting internet-enabled devices).
  • DBS Status: Placed on the Barring List (Indefinite ban on working with children).
  • Legal Status: CONVICTED (Sexual communication with a child).
  • Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Leicester Crown Court; evidence provided by Derbyshire Hunting Squad; investigated by Leicestershire Police.
  • Criminal Record: Targeted a decoy “girl” aged 13; Gave detailed sexual instructions; Arranged a meeting and discussed contraception for a minor.
  • Origin: Leicester, Leicestershire.

Monitoring and Public Protection

Mushing is managed as a registered sex offender within the Leicester area following his release. Due to the nature of his conduct—specifically his “pedagogical approach” to grooming and his calculated discussion of contraception for a 13-year-old—his management is a priority for the Leicestershire Police Public Protection Unit. Authorities state that his attempt to move from digital communication to a physical meeting identifies him as a persistent predator who requires consistent monitoring of his online footprint.

As a registered sex offender, the defendant’s details are permanently logged on the national police database. Authorities state that his SHPO includes strict conditions regarding the disclosure of any device capable of accessing the internet. Any change of residence in Leicester, any failure to report his digital aliases, or any unauthorised proximity to children will result in immediate arrest to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from his demonstrated pattern of seeking to exploit minors.


QUESTION – Given that the offender used a “teaching” persona to facilitate grooming, do you believe that “Educational Manipulation” should carry a mandatory higher sentence than standard sexual communication?


If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.