In 2018, the Offender Database recorded that Scott Watt—then living in Wynyard Mews, Hartlepool—remained under lifelong statutory monitoring following his convictions for the rape of two young girls. Watt appeared at Teesside Crown Court in 2007, where he was sentenced to five and a half years in a young offenders’ institution. It was reported that the investigation established Watt, who was 16 at the time of the offences, targeted two girls aged 13 and 14 while they were in a vulnerable and intoxicated state.
The investigation established that the attacks occurred in two separate locations across Hartlepool: one in a clearing in a wooded area and the second within a residential garage. The prosecution reported that Watt took advantage of the victims’ drunkenness to carry out the rapes. Teesside Crown Court heard that while Watt was only convicted of these two counts, several other girls had come forward with similar complaints of sexual assault, though these were not proceeded with at the time of the trial.
Judicial Findings and Investigative Detail
The court reported that Watt’s actions were “predatory and grave,” necessitating a significant period of detention and extended supervision. The investigation established that upon his sentencing in 2007, Watt burst into tears before being removed from the dock. The prosecution reported that as part of his sentence, Watt was ordered to remain on licence for six years following his release and was placed on the sex offenders register for life.
Judge-led proceedings at Teesside Crown Court concluded that Watt posed a significant risk to the public, particularly to young females. For his actions in Hartlepool and the “devastating impact” on his victims, he was subjected to the most stringent monitoring requirements. The judge noted that the lifelong registration was a vital safeguard to ensure that Watt’s whereabouts and activities are permanently tracked by the authorities to prevent any recurrence of his “vile and opportunistic” behaviour.
Status and Statutory Requirements
For the records reported in Cleveland and Hartlepool, the status of Scott Watt as of April 9, 2026, was as follows:
- Custodial Status: RELEASED (Sentenced 2007; served custodial term; completed extended licence period in 2018).
- Sex Offenders Register: Notification requirements are active for life.
- SHPO Status: Subject to a Sexual Harm Prevention Order (Including strict bans on unsupervised contact with children and digital monitoring).
- DBS Status: Placed on the Barring List (Indefinite ban on working with children or vulnerable adults).
- Legal Status: CONVICTED (Rape x2).
- Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Teesside Crown Court; investigated by Cleveland Police.
- Criminal Record: Convicted of double rape as a teenager; Targeted girls aged 13 and 14; Used wooded areas and garages to isolate victims; Subject of multiple further complaints.
- Origin: Wynyard Mews, Hartlepool, Cleveland.
Monitoring and Public Protection
Watt is managed as a high-risk registered sex offender within the Hartlepool area under the Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA). Due to the nature of his conduct—specifically his “history of targeting multiple intoxicated minors”—his management is a priority for the Cleveland Police Public Protection Unit. Authorities state that his status as a “double rapist” identifies him as an individual who requires the most intensive tier of statutory oversight, including unannounced home visits and strict monitoring of his social circles.
As a registered sex offender for life, the 35-year-old’s details are permanently logged on the national police database. Authorities state that his lifelong notification requirements provide a permanent mechanism for police to manage the risk he poses to the community. Any change of residence in Hartlepool or elsewhere, any attempt to access regulated activity, or any unauthorised proximity to children will result in immediate arrest to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from a man who demonstrated a persistent and “predatory intent” toward vulnerable young girls.
QUESTION – Given that the offender was only 16 when he committed a double rape but was the subject of “multiple other complaints,” do you believe that “Unprosecuted Complaints” should be formally used as aggravating evidence to trigger a Whole-Life Order?
If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.