In 2018, the Offender Database recorded that 33-year-old Richard John Luke Mooney was jailed for a violent assault on his partner followed by the sexual assault of a five-year-old boy. Mooney—originally from Manchester—was sentenced at Manchester Crown Court following a series of offences that began in 2014. It was reported that the investigation was launched after Mooney gained the trust of a vulnerable woman and her child, only to subject the mother to a brutal attack that left her with broken ribs, cuts, and extensive bruising.
The investigation established that Mooney’s predatory behaviour escalated while he was on bail for the domestic assault. Manchester Crown Court heard that in February 2015, Mooney was arrested for the sexual assault of his ex-partner’s five-year-old son. The prosecution reported that while Mooney was remanded at HMP Lancaster Farms, he obtained an illicit mobile phone through a family member serving in the same prison, which he used to make threatening and abusive calls to his ex-partner.
Judicial Findings and Investigative Detail
The court reported that Mooney was an offender who refused to engage with rehabilitation. Manchester Crown Court heard that despite entering a last-minute guilty plea for the child sexual abuse, Mooney continued to protest his innocence. The investigation established that Mooney refused to complete mandatory sexual offence courses, stating he would not participate just to get parole, thereby demonstrating a total lack of remorse for the trauma inflicted on the five-year-old victim.
Judge-led proceedings in August 2016 resulted in Mooney being handed an Extended Determinate Sentence of five years in custody with an additional five-year extended licence period. For his actions in Manchester and Stoke-on-Trent, he was moved to HMP Manchester (Strangeways) to serve his term. The judge noted that Mooney’s history of domestic violence and child sexual abuse, combined with his refusal to cooperate with prison authorities, made him a significant danger to the public upon any eventual release.
Status and Statutory Requirements
For the records reported in Greater Manchester and Staffordshire, the status of Richard John Luke Mooney as of April 5, 2026, was as follows:
- Custodial Status: SERVING/ON LICENCE (5-year custodial term; 5-year extended licence; sentenced 2016).
- Sex Offenders Register: Notification requirements are active for life.
- Licence Status: Subject to intensive post-release supervision in Manchester or Stoke-on-Trent.
- Legal Status: CONVICTED (Sexual assault of a child under 13; Actual Bodily Harm; 2 counts).
- Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Manchester Crown Court; investigated by Greater Manchester Police.
- Criminal Record: Sexual assault of a 5-year-old; Breaking a partner’s ribs; Illicit phone use in prison; Witness intimidation.
- Physical Description: 5’9”; Strong Mancunian accent; Facial scar on cheek; Self-harm scars on forearms.
Monitoring and Public Protection
Mooney is managed as a high-risk registered sex offender within the Manchester and Stoke-on-Trent areas. Due to the nature of his conduct—which involved the violent assault of a woman and the sexual exploitation of her child—his management is a maximum priority for the North West Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA). Authorities state that his refusal to participate in sexual offender treatment programmes indicates a persistent and unaddressed risk to women and children.
As a registered sex offender for life, the 33-year-old’s details are permanently logged on the national police database. Authorities state that his extended licence period ensures he is subject to conditions, including mandatory GPS tagging and exclusion zones. Any failure to notify police of his movements in Manchester, any unauthorized contact with his victims, or any reports of aggressive behaviour will result in his immediate arrest and recall to prison for the remainder of his ten-year total sentence to ensure the ongoing safety of the public from his demonstrated pattern of violence and abuse.
QUESTION – Given that the offender was able to obtain a mobile phone through a family member in prison to intimidate his victim, do you believe that “Family Visitation Bans” should be a mandatory legal requirement for any inmate caught using smuggled technology to harass their previous victims?
If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.