CHRISTOPHER OLDLAND FORMBY SCOUT LEADER PAEDOPHILE

CHRISTOPHER OLDLAND FORMBY SCOUT LEADER PAEDOPHILECHRISTOPHER OLDLAND FORMBY SCOUT LEADER PAEDOPHILE

In 2019, the Offender Database recorded that 54-year-old Christopher John Oldland walked free from court after being caught with hundreds of indecent images of children. Oldland—formerly of Greenloons Drive, Formby, and later of Stanley Road, Bootle—admitted to possessing 570 images, including 104 Category A files, which represent the most severe level of abuse. It was reported that Oldland, a married father, was a volunteer “Scoutmaster” at the 8th Formby Scout Group based at St Luke’s Church and also managed a community centre featuring an Ofsted-registered nursery.

The investigation established that police acted on intelligence to arrest Oldland at the SING Plus Centre on Cambridge Road on 10 July 2018. Merseyside Police reported that officers seized mobile phones, a tower computer, and a USB device containing the collection. The prosecution reported that forensic analysis rubbished Oldland’s claims that the pictures appeared via “pop-ups,” instead indicating that he had sought out the material, which included images of victims as young as three years old being molested.

Judicial Findings and Investigative Detail

The court reported that Oldland’s position of trust within the community was a deeply concerning factor in the case. Liverpool Crown Court heard that as the manager and company secretary of the Seaforth Information Network Group (SING), Oldland had oversight of facilities providing holiday play schemes, youth activities, and disability groups. The investigation established that while there was no evidence of contact offences, his involvement in the market for such “troubling” images of suffering and degradation was a grave matter.

Judge Alan Conrad, QC, presided over the sentencing in 2019, describing the suffering of the three and four-year-old victims in the photos as deeply distressing. For his actions in Formby and Bootle, Oldland was handed a 42-week prison sentence, which the judge suspended for two years to allow for rehabilitation. The judge noted that it was more constructive for Oldland to receive help for his “problem” than to face immediate custody, though he made it clear the defendant should never work with children again.


Status and Statutory Requirements

For the records reported in England, the status of Christopher Oldland as of April 2, 2026, was as follows:

  • Custodial Status: SUSPENDED SENTENCE 2019 (42 weeks suspended for 2 years; term completed).
  • Sex Offenders Register: Notification requirements are active until 2029 (10-year term).
  • SHPO Status: Sexual Harm Prevention Order active (Indefinite/Term-specific as per 2019 order).
  • Judicial Oversight: Sentenced at Liverpool Crown Court following a Merseyside Police investigation.
  • Criminal Record: Possession of indecent images of children (Category A, B, and C).
  • Origin: Formby and Bootle, Merseyside.

Monitoring and Public Protection

Oldland is managed as a registered sex offender within the Merseyside area. Due to the nature of his conduct, which involved the possession of the most graphic categories of child abuse while holding high-level positions in childcare and youth volunteering, his management is a priority for the local MOSOVO (Management of Sexual Offenders and Violent Offenders) unit. Authorities state that his history of seeking out “vile” material while working in an Ofsted-registered environment necessitates rigorous oversight by the MAPPA (Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements) team.

As a registered sex offender until 2029, Oldland’s details are permanently logged on the national police database. Authorities state that his Sexual Harm Prevention Order strictly prohibits him from any form of employment or voluntary work involving children or young people. Any failure to notify police of his movements in Bootle, any attempt to return to youth leadership roles, or any unauthorised access to digital devices will result in immediate arrest and the potential activation of his original prison term to ensure the ongoing safety of the public.


QUESTION – Given that this offender was in a management position over an Ofsted-registered nursery while possessing Category A images, do you believe that a suspended sentence was an adequate response to such a significant breach of public trust?


If you or anyone you know has been affected by the individuals highlighted on this website, please report them to the Police on 101 (999 in an emergency) or visit their online resources for further details on reporting a crime. You can also report to Crimestoppers if you wish to remain completely anonymous. There is help available on our support links page.